We use cookies to make this site as useful as possible. Read our cookie policy or ignore.

List of restrictive company names to be reduced

07 October 2013 by Alexandra Jones

Startup businesses are to face fewer stumbling blocks as the Business Minister announced plans last week to reduce the list of ‘sensitive’ company names.

Under the current system, new companies must get their name approved by Companies House, or a specified body, however Jo Swinson is to implement measures to cut this list.


Businesses that want to use words such as ‘authority’, ‘board’, ‘European’, ‘group’, ‘international’ and ‘national’ will no longer have to get prior approval.


This red tape cutting exercise will result in a quicker process for companies wishing to use a ‘sensitive’ word or expression in their registered name.


The consultation on the Company and Business Names regime received 254 responses when it was launched earlier this year.


There are currently over 150 words and expressions on the ‘sensitive’ list, which will now be reduced by a third; these changes will come into force next year.


The words and expressions to be retained are those which, when misused, are likely to cause confusion as to what the business actually does or has the legal authority to do.


These words, amongst others, include ‘accredited’, ‘bank’, ‘chamber of’, ‘charity’, ‘institute’, ‘government’, and ‘university.’


The word ‘Sheffield’ is to be retained on the list after responses to the consultation showed support to keep it.


The same applies to national words such as ‘English’, ‘Scottish, ‘Northern Irish’, ‘Welsh’ and ‘Cymru.’


Business Minister Jo Swinson said: ‘Making life easier for startup businesses will help to create a stronger economy. Rules on certain types of words shouldn’t be an additional hurdle, so reducing the list of company names needing approval makes sense.


However, we also need to make sure that businesses can’t pass themselves off as something they’re not. We have struck a balance which reduces the regulations on new businesses, but that also keeps historic and sensitive names rightfully on the list.’

Have your say

comments powered by Disqus