We use cookies to make this site as useful as possible. Read our cookie policy or ignore.

NAPF sets out new remuneration principles

20 November 2013 by Alexandra Jones

New remuneration principles and more robust expectations for corporate accountability are the latest changes to the Corporate Governance Policy and Voting Guidelines published by the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF).

The guidance puts greater emphasis on corporate reporting of extra-financial factors and strongly encourages investors to utilise their full range of powers. It includes a new set of remuneration principles against which investors can judge the appropriateness of the company’s pay policy with the power vote against the policy if it is deemed unsuitable.


Joanne Segars, NAPF Chief Executive, said: ‘The NAPF’s priority is to maximise the long-term returns of our members’ assets, irrespective of the potential for short-term discomfort. Our guidelines aim to support our members in promoting the success of the companies in which they invest and ensuring that the board and management of those companies are held properly accountable to their shareholders. 


‘This year, we are more strongly encouraging companies to identify and engage with their long-term investors, rather than those on their register who are more interested in short-term trading. We expect remuneration committees to set rewards which drive long-term strategic success and seek to reward performance over the longer-term – in most cases this will be longer than three years.’


Reflecting growing concerns about the length of some auditor tenures, the NAPF policy also places greater emphasis on the importance of safeguarding the independence of the external auditor. It includes for the first time a cap on non-audit fees of 100% of audit fees (or a material monetary sum of £500,000). If this cap is exceeded in successive years, investors are encouraged to vote against the chair of the audit committee or the audit fees. 


Another change to the NAPF policy encourages boards to explain to shareholders how they approach oversight and management of material extra-financial risks, including risks to reputation such as their approach to tax management. 


Have your say

comments powered by Disqus